Signing documents online is fast, convenient, and in many cases, legally binding - but not all digital signatures offer the same level of protection or recognition.
If you’re navigating contracts or compliance, understanding which type to use really matters.
Let’s break down the core types of electronic signature under the eIDAS Regulation: Standard Electronic Signature (SES), Advanced Electronic Signature (AES), and Qualified Electronic Signature (QES).
If you need to prove who signed, defend the signature’s validity, or meet strict legal requirements, knowing the differences is key.
A digital signature is a secure, encrypted mark or code added to an electronic document to confirm the signatory’s identity and their intent to agree - in effect, a digital “handshake.”
In the European Union, the eIDAS Regulation governs how digital signatures work and their legal weight.
SES is any digital indication of agreement, like signing an email with your name or clicking “I accept.”
These signatures are legally valid under eIDAS, but their strength in legal disputes is generally limited.
They’re easy, cost-effective, and great for low-risk, everyday agreements.
However, SES is also vulnerable to forgery and impersonation, and it offers minimal evidence if challenged in court.
AES steps it up by requiring that the signature is:
This level is most often backed by Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), using encrypted keys and certificates.
AES carries greater evidentiary value in legal disputes and is a strong choice for medium-risk transactions (like employment contracts or financial documents).
QES takes security even further. It’s an AES that’s:
QES has the highest legal status - it’s the only type considered equal to a handwritten signature throughout the EU (and recognised by UK law post-Brexit for most regulated sectors).
QES is required for high-stakes legal acts like land registration, government dealings, and cross-border filings.
QES is extremely robust, but more complex and costly to implement.
It usually requires specialised software, devices, and face-to-face or video ID checks.
You need to think about:
For day-to-day, low-risk work, SES is often fine.
For anything valuable, personal, or regulated, AES is the safer default.
For deeds, court, or major regulated transactions, only QES will do.
Whatever signature you use, ensure the platform itself is secure, compliant, and transparent in audit logs.
Document who signed, when, from where, and with what evidence.
This helps you prove intent and identity if a dispute arises.
"There is no 'good and bad' when it comes to security.
SES is a great example of a tool that meets this demand head-on, giving businesses the tools to move forward without friction.
It can be adequate for a majority of processes."
Paul Holland, Beyond Encryption
Yes. All signature types are legally recognised under eIDAS (and UK eIDAS), but evidentiary strength and acceptance vary.
For minor, informal, or internal agreements, yes. For high-risk or regulated deals, use AES or QES for additional security and legal protection.
Yes, but a more secure signature (AES/QES) and detailed audit trail make disputes less risky.
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS Regulation), European Union, 2014
ICO Guide to eIDAS, ICO, 2025, ICO, 2023
Electronic Execution of Documents, UK Government, 2019
Adobe: eIDAS Compliance, Adobe, 2024
Sam Kendall, 25.04.2025